1. |
CH, Primak AN, Braun N, et al. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin N Am 2009; 47:27-40.
|
2. |
DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:2277-84.
|
3. |
MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004; 230:619-28.
|
4. |
J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006; 113:1305-10.
|
5. |
WA, Buchenau S, Deak P, et al. Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT. Phys Med 2008; 24:71-9.
|
6. |
J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009; 301:500-7.
|
7. |
FV, Gould R, Yeh BM, et al. CT radiation dose: what can you do right now in your practice? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196:619-25.
|
8. |
M, Scatarige JC, Cooper J, et al. Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:1273-5.
|
9. |
Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195:713-9.
|
10 |
P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, et al. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 2010; 45:202-10.
|
11 |
D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST, et al. Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm initial clinical experience. Radiology 2010; 254:145-53.
|
12 |
AC, Sæther HK, Hol PK, et al. Iterative reconstruction reduces abdominal CT dose. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:1483-7.
|
13 |
Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M, et al. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology 2013; 266:197-206.
|
14 |
R, Schoepf UJ, Wu R, et al. CT coronary angiography: image quality with sinogram affirmed iterative recon- struction compared with filtered back-projection. Clin Radiol 2013; 68:272-8.
|
15 |
AD, Mayes N, Boulter DJ. Use of high-pitch dual-source computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis to markedly reduce scan time: clinical feasibility study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35:353-5.
|
16 |
NA, Mader C, Alkadhi H, et al. Routine chest and abdominal high-pitch CT: an alternative low dose protocol with preserved image quality. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:e392-7.
|
17 |
AB, Sahni VA, Sadow CA, et al. Feasibility of low-tube-voltage excretory phase images during CT urography: assessment using a dual-energy CT scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197:1146-51.
|
18 |
LJ, Peng J, Wu SY, et al. Liver virtual non-enhanced CT with dual-source, dual-energy CT: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:2257-64.
|
19 |
PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, et al. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 2006; 79:968-80.
|
20 |
DJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 2004; 231:440-5.
|
21 |
AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007; 298:317-23.
|
22 |
S, Jung SE, Rha SE, et al. Reducing radiation in CT urography for hematuria: effect of using 100 kilovoltage protocol. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:e830-4.
|
23 |
U, Anders K, Steinbichler G, et al. Improvement of image quality of multislice spiral CT scans of the head and neck region using a raw data-based multidimensional adaptive filtering (MAF) technique. Eur Radiol 2004; 14:1873-81.
|
24 |
S, Kalra MK, Moore MA, et al. Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 2009; 252:200-8.
|
25 |
U, Klotz E, Abolmaali N. Performance assessment of dynamic spiral scan modes with variable pitch for quantitative perfusion computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2010; 45:378-86.
|
26 |
A, May MS, Scharf M, et al. Attenuation-based automatic kilovolt selection in abdominal computed tomography: effects on radiation exposure and image quality. Invest Radiol 2012; 47:559-65.
|
27 |
KH, Lee JM, Moon SK, et al. Attenuation-based automatic tube voltage selection and tube current modulation for dose reduction at contrast-enhanced liver CT. Radiology 2012; 265:437-47.
|
28 |
HJ, Chung YE, Lee YH, et al. Radiation dose reduction via sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction and automatic tube voltage modulation (CARE kV) in abdominal CT. Korean J Radiol 2013; 14: 886-93.
|
29 |
S, Winklehner A, Karlo C, et al. Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:2597-606.
|
30 |
C, Mulvihill DM, Nguyen SA, et al. Pediatric cardiovascular CT angiography: radiation dose reduction using automatic anatomic tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190:1232-40.
|
31 |
ST, Nelson RC, Yoshizumi T, et al. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study. Acad Radiol 2009; 16:997-1002.
|
32 |
L, Li H, Fletcher JG, et al. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy. Med Phys 2010; 37:234-43.
|
33 |
XH, Ding XF, Wu RZ, et al. Radiation dose of non-enhanced chest CT can be reduced 40% by using iterative reconstruction in image space. Clin Radiol 2011; 66:1023-9.
|