1. |
1.Arieff AI. Fatal postoperative pulmonary edema: Patho- genesis and literature review. Chest 1999; 115:1371-7.
|
2. |
2.Yoshihisa Fujita MD, Tokunori Yamamoto, MD, et al. A comparison of changes in cardiac preload variables during graded hypovolemia and hypervolemia in mechanically ventilated dogs. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1780-6.
|
3. |
3.Morgan BC, Martin WE, Hornbein TF, et al. Hemody- namic effects of intermittent positive pressure respiration. Anesthesiology 1966; 27:584-90.
|
4. |
4.Taylor RR, Covell JW, Sonnenblick EH, et al. Dependence of ventricular distensibility on filling of the opposite ventricle. Am J Physiol 1967; 213:711-8.
|
5. |
5.Swarm DG. The utility of pulmonary artery catheterization. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85:501-3.
|
6. |
6.Brower R, Wise RA, Hassapoyannes C. Effect of lung inflayion on lung blood volume and pulmonary venous flow. J Appl Physiol 1995; 58:954-63.
|
7. |
7.Monnet W, Teboul JL. Volume responsiveness. Crit Care 2007; 13:549-53.
|
8. |
8.Pinsky MR, Payen D. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 2005; 9:566-72.
|
9. |
9.Cavallaw F, Sandreni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamie monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anestesial 2008; 74:123-35.
|
10 |
10.Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-8.
|
11 |
11.Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: Pulmonary artery catheter versus unca- librated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1480-6.
|
12 |
12.de Waal EE, Kalkman CJ, Rex S, et al. Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:1904-9.
|
13 |
13.Mayer J, Boldt J, Wolf MW, et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Validity of a second generation device. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:867-72.
|
14 |
14.Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, et al. Measurement of cardiac output: A comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:337-42.
|
15 |
15.Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:761-8.
|
16 |
16.Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Quinart A, et al. Uncalibrated stroke volume variations are able to predict the hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome after liver transplantation. Anesthesiology 2009; 111:856-62.
|
17 |
17.Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Roullet S, et al. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by Vigileo/FloTrac system and aortic Doppler echocardio- graphy. Anesth Analg 2009; 109:466-9.
|
18 |
18.Monge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Diaz Monrove JC. Arterial pressure changes during the Valsalva maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:77-84.
|
19 |
19.Monge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Díaz Monrové JC. Brachial artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 2009; 13:R142.
|
20 |
20.Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:419- 28.
|
21 |
21.Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Feltinger TW, et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94:318-23.
|