1. |
Cobb J. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instr Course Lect 1948; 5:261-75.
|
2 |
2.Gladnick BP, Schreiber JJ, Ishmael CR, et al. Assessment of vertebral curves using the Manual Post-It(R) Tech- nique. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013; [Epub ahead of print].
|
3. |
Jacquot F, Charpentier A, Khelifi S, et al. Measuring the Cobb angle with the iPhone in kyphoses: A reliability study. Int Orthop 2012; 36:1655-60.
|
4. |
De Vriendt T, Clays E, et al. Reliability and validity of the Adolescent Stress Questionnaire in a sample of European adolescents—the HELENA study. BMC public health 2011; 11:717.
|
5. |
Shaw M, Adam CJ, Izatt MT, et al. Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2012; 21:1062-8.
|
6. |
Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV. Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65:447-55.
|
7. |
Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, et al. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72:320-7.
|
8. |
Qiao J, Liu Z, Xu L, et al. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012; 25:E88-92.
|
9. |
Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, et al. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: Manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J 2007; 16:1587-92.
|
10 |
Zhang J, Lou E, Hill DL, et al. Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010;48:185-95.
|
11 |
Rosenfeldt MP, Harding IJ, Hauptfleisch JT, et al. A comparison of traditional protractor versus Oxford Cobbometer radiographic measurement: Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine 2005; 30:440-3.
|
12 |
Langensiepen S, Semler O, Sobottke R, et al. Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review. Eur Spine J 2013; 22: 2360-71.
|
13 |
Tanure MC, Pinheiro AP, Oliveira AS. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Spine J 2010; 10:769-74.
|
14 |
Allen S, Parent E, Khorasani M, et al. Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of Cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Digital Imaging 2008; 21:208-18.
|
15 |
Oda M, Rauh S, Gregory PB, et al. The significance of roentgenographic measurement in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1982; 2:378-82.
|