Clinical Study on Suspension Pancreatic-Duct-Jejunum End-to-Side Continuous Suture Anastomosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
nullIssue 1, Pages: 34-38(2013)
Updated:2024-04-10
|
Share with wechat friends or circle of friends
Export references
Clinical Study on Suspension Pancreatic-Duct-Jejunum End-to-Side Continuous Suture Anastomosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Affiliations:
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital,Chengdu,China,610072
Author bio:
Funds:
DOI:
CLC:
Published Online:26 March 2013,
Published:2013
Accepted:
Scan QR Code
Ke Dong, Wei Xiong, Xiao-jiong Yu, et al. Clinical Study on Suspension Pancreatic-Duct-Jejunum End-to-Side Continuous Suture Anastomosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Null, 2013, (1): 34-38.
DOI:
Ke Dong, Wei Xiong, Xiao-jiong Yu, et al. Clinical Study on Suspension Pancreatic-Duct-Jejunum End-to-Side Continuous Suture Anastomosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Null, 2013, (1): 34-38.DOI:
Clinical Study on Suspension Pancreatic-Duct-Jejunum End-to-Side Continuous Suture Anastomosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
To study the influence of Suspension Pancreatic-Duct-Jejunum End-to-Side Continuous Suture Anastomosis (SPDJCS) on the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy
and to analyze its applicability
safety
and efficacies. Methods A prospective controlled trial was conducted with 165 cases receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery from January 2010 to May 2012. The patients were divided into Group A (end-to-end/end-to-side invaginated anastomosis
n=52)
Group B (end-to-side mucosal anastomosis
n=48)
and Group C (SPDJCS
n=65). The preoperative data
intraoperative data
and operative outcomes (incidence of pancreatic fistula
operation time
intraoperative blood loss
peritoneal drainage
peritoneal hemorrhage
peritoneal abscess
delayed gastric emptying
pulmonary infection
postoperative infection
blood transfusion
and perioperative mortality) were compared among the 3 groups. Results The total incidence of pancreatic fistula was 13.9% (23/165) in all the 165 patients. The incidence in Group A and Group B was 23.1% (12/52) and 18.8% (9/48)
both higher than that in Group C [3.1% (2/65)
both P<0.05]. Group C showed significantly better outcomes than group A and B in terms of the operation time (5.5±1.2 hours vs. 6.1±1.1 hours
5.5±1.2 hours vs. 6.3±1.5 hours)
volume of blood loss (412.0±205.0 mL vs. 525.0±217.0 mL
412.0±205.0 mL vs. 514.0±217.0 mL)
and postoperative drainage amount of plasma tubes (175.0±65.0 mL vs. 275.0±80.0 mL
175.0±65.0 mL vs. 255.0±75.0 mL) (all P<0.05)
while Group A and Group B displayed no difference in these aspects (P>0.05). As complications other than pancreatic fistula were concerned
the three groups were not different from each other (P>0.05). Conclusions SPDJCS may have the effect of reducing the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. It could be safe
practical and convenient technique of anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy.
Abstract
To study the influence of Suspension Pancreatic-Duct-Jejunum End-to-Side Continuous Suture Anastomosis (SPDJCS) on the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy
and to analyze its applicability
safety
and efficacies. Methods A prospective controlled trial was conducted with 165 cases receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery from January 2010 to May 2012. The patients were divided into Group A (end-to-end/end-to-side invaginated anastomosis
n=52)
Group B (end-to-side mucosal anastomosis
n=48)
and Group C (SPDJCS
n=65). The preoperative data
intraoperative data
and operative outcomes (incidence of pancreatic fistula
operation time
intraoperative blood loss
peritoneal drainage
peritoneal hemorrhage
peritoneal abscess
delayed gastric emptying
pulmonary infection
postoperative infection
blood transfusion
and perioperative mortality) were compared among the 3 groups. Results The total incidence of pancreatic fistula was 13.9% (23/165) in all the 165 patients. The incidence in Group A and Group B was 23.1% (12/52) and 18.8% (9/48)
both higher than that in Group C [3.1% (2/65)
both P<0.05]. Group C showed significantly better outcomes than group A and B in terms of the operation time (5.5±1.2 hours vs. 6.1±1.1 hours
5.5±1.2 hours vs. 6.3±1.5 hours)
volume of blood loss (412.0±205.0 mL vs. 525.0±217.0 mL
412.0±205.0 mL vs. 514.0±217.0 mL)
and postoperative drainage amount of plasma tubes (175.0±65.0 mL vs. 275.0±80.0 mL
175.0±65.0 mL vs. 255.0±75.0 mL) (all P<0.05)
while Group A and Group B displayed no difference in these aspects (P>0.05). As complications other than pancreatic fistula were concerned
the three groups were not different from each other (P>0.05). Conclusions SPDJCS may have the effect of reducing the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. It could be safe
practical and convenient technique of anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy.