

FOLLOWUS
1. Department of Radiology
2. Department of Cardiology, Baotou Central Hospital,Baotou,China,014040
3. CT BM Clinic Marketing, Siemens Healthcare,Beijing,China,100102
4. ,China
5. Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University,Wuhan,China,430071
Published Online:07 January 2013,
Published:2012
Scan QR Code
Kai Sun, Rui-juan Han, Li-fang Cui, et al. Feasibility and Diagnostic Accuracy for Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis of Prospectively Electrocardiogram-gated High-pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with Relatively Higher Heart Rates: in Comparison with Catheter Coronary Angiography△[J]. Null, 2012, (4): 213-219.
Kai Sun, Rui-juan Han, Li-fang Cui, et al. Feasibility and Diagnostic Accuracy for Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis of Prospectively Electrocardiogram-gated High-pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with Relatively Higher Heart Rates: in Comparison with Catheter Coronary Angiography△[J]. Null, 2012, (4): 213-219. DOI:
Objective To prospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery stenosis of prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered spiral acquisition mode (high pitch mode) dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with relatively higher heart rates (HR) compared with catheter coronary angiography (CCA). Methods Forty-seven consecutive patients with relatively higher HR (>65 and <100 bpm) (20 male
27 female; age 55±10 years) who both underwent dual-source CTCA and CCA were prospectively included in this study. All patients were performed CTCA using high pitch mode setting at 20%-30% of the R-R interval for the image acquisition. All coronary segments were evaluated by two blinded and independent observers with regard to image quality on a three-point scale (1: excellent to 3: non-diagnostic) and for the presence of significant coronary stenoses (defined as diameter narrowing exceeding 50%). Considered CCA as the standard of reference
the sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Radiation dose values were calculated using the dose-length product. Results Image quality was rated as being score 1 in 92.4% of segments
score 2 in 6.1% of segmentsand score 3 in 1.5% of segments. The average image quality score per segment was 1.064±0.306. The HR variability of patients with image score 1
2 and 3 were 2.29±1.06 bpm
5.17±1.37 bpm
8.88±1.53 bpm
respectively. The average HR variability of patients with different image scores were significantly different (F=170.402
P=0.001). The sensitivity
specificity
positive and negative predictive values were 92.6%
97.0%
87.6%
98.3%
respectively
per segment and 90.0%
95.2%
85.3%
96.9%
respectively
per vessel and 100%
63.6%
90.0%
100%
respectively
per patient. The effective radiation dose was on average 0.86±0.16 mSv. Conclusion In patients with HR more than 65 bpm and below 100 bpm without cardiac arrhythmia
the prospectively electrocardiogram-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode with image acquired timing set at 20%-30% of the R-R interval provides a high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of coronary stenoses combined with a 1.5% of non-diagnostic coronary segments and a radiation dose below 1 mSv.
Objective To prospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery stenosis of prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered spiral acquisition mode (high pitch mode) dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with relatively higher heart rates (HR) compared with catheter coronary angiography (CCA). Methods Forty-seven consecutive patients with relatively higher HR (>65 and <100 bpm) (20 male
27 female; age 55±10 years) who both underwent dual-source CTCA and CCA were prospectively included in this study. All patients were performed CTCA using high pitch mode setting at 20%-30% of the R-R interval for the image acquisition. All coronary segments were evaluated by two blinded and independent observers with regard to image quality on a three-point scale (1: excellent to 3: non-diagnostic) and for the presence of significant coronary stenoses (defined as diameter narrowing exceeding 50%). Considered CCA as the standard of reference
the sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Radiation dose values were calculated using the dose-length product. Results Image quality was rated as being score 1 in 92.4% of segments
score 2 in 6.1% of segmentsand score 3 in 1.5% of segments. The average image quality score per segment was 1.064±0.306. The HR variability of patients with image score 1
2 and 3 were 2.29±1.06 bpm
5.17±1.37 bpm
8.88±1.53 bpm
respectively. The average HR variability of patients with different image scores were significantly different (F=170.402
P=0.001). The sensitivity
specificity
positive and negative predictive values were 92.6%
97.0%
87.6%
98.3%
respectively
per segment and 90.0%
95.2%
85.3%
96.9%
respectively
per vessel and 100%
63.6%
90.0%
100%
respectively
per patient. The effective radiation dose was on average 0.86±0.16 mSv. Conclusion In patients with HR more than 65 bpm and below 100 bpm without cardiac arrhythmia
the prospectively electrocardiogram-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode with image acquired timing set at 20%-30% of the R-R interval provides a high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of coronary stenoses combined with a 1.5% of non-diagnostic coronary segments and a radiation dose below 1 mSv.
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621