

FOLLOWUS
Published:2009
Scan QR Code
[1].Posterior Selective Thoracic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients:a Comparison of All Pedicle Screws versus Hybrid Instrumentation[J].Chinese Medical Sciences Journal,2009,24(01):30-35.
Bin Yu, Jian-guo Zhang, Gui-xing Qiu, et al. Posterior Selective Thoracic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients:a Comparison of All Pedicle Screws versus Hybrid Instrumentation[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2009, 24(1): 30-35.
[1].Posterior Selective Thoracic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients:a Comparison of All Pedicle Screws versus Hybrid Instrumentation[J].Chinese Medical Sciences Journal,2009,24(01):30-35. DOI:
Bin Yu, Jian-guo Zhang, Gui-xing Qiu, et al. Posterior Selective Thoracic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients:a Comparison of All Pedicle Screws versus Hybrid Instrumentation[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2009, 24(1): 30-35. DOI:
Objective To analyze the influence of segmental pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation on the correction results in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior selective thoracic fusion. Methods By reviewing the medical records and roentgenograms of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent selective thoracic fusion from February 2000 to January 2007 in our hospital
the patients were divided into 2 groups according to different instrumentation fashions: Group A was hook-screw-rod (hybrid) internal fixation type
Group B was screw-rod (all pedicle screws) internal fixation type
and the screws were used in every segment on the concave side of the thoracic curve. The parameters of the scoliosis were measured and the correction results were analyzed. Results Totally
48 patients (7 males
41 females) were included
with an average age of 14.4 years old and a mean follow-up time of 12.3 months. Thirty and 18 patients were assigned to group A and group B
respectively. The mean preoperative coronal Cobb angles of the thoracic curve were 48.8° and 47.4°
respectively. After surgery
they were corrected to 13.7° and 6.8°
respectively. At final follow-up
they were 17.0° and 9.5°
with an average correction rate of 64.6% and 79.0%
respectively
and the correction rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (P=0.003). The mean preoperative coronal Cobb angles of the lumbar curve were 32.6° and 35.2°
respectively. After surgery
they were corrected to 8.6° and 8.3°
respectively. At final follow-up
they were 10.3° and 11.1°
with an average correction rate of 66.8% and 69.9%
respectively
and the correction rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (P=0.003). The correction loss of the thoracic curve and lumbar curve in the 2 groups were 3.1° and 1.8°
2.4° and 2.4°
respectively. No significant difference was noted (both P>0.05). The decompensation rate at final follow-up in these 2 groups were 4% (1/25) and 7.1% (1/14) respectively
with no significant difference (P>0.05).Conclusions Both all pedicle screws and hybrid instrumentation can offer good correction results of the thoracic curve and lumbar curve in posterior selective thoracic fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. While with all pedicle screws
the correction results of the thoracic curve and lumbar curve are both better than those with hybrid instrumentation without increased decompensation rate.
Objective To analyze the influence of segmental pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation on the correction results in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior selective thoracic fusion. Methods By reviewing the medical records and roentgenograms of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent selective thoracic fusion from February 2000 to January 2007 in our hospital
the patients were divided into 2 groups according to different instrumentation fashions: Group A was hook-screw-rod (hybrid) internal fixation type
Group B was screw-rod (all pedicle screws) internal fixation type
and the screws were used in every segment on the concave side of the thoracic curve. The parameters of the scoliosis were measured and the correction results were analyzed. Results Totally
48 patients (7 males
41 females) were included
with an average age of 14.4 years old and a mean follow-up time of 12.3 months. Thirty and 18 patients were assigned to group A and group B
respectively. The mean preoperative coronal Cobb angles of the thoracic curve were 48.8° and 47.4°
respectively. After surgery
they were corrected to 13.7° and 6.8°
respectively. At final follow-up
they were 17.0° and 9.5°
with an average correction rate of 64.6% and 79.0%
respectively
and the correction rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (P=0.003). The mean preoperative coronal Cobb angles of the lumbar curve were 32.6° and 35.2°
respectively. After surgery
they were corrected to 8.6° and 8.3°
respectively. At final follow-up
they were 10.3° and 11.1°
with an average correction rate of 66.8% and 69.9%
respectively
and the correction rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (P=0.003). The correction loss of the thoracic curve and lumbar curve in the 2 groups were 3.1° and 1.8°
2.4° and 2.4°
respectively. No significant difference was noted (both P>0.05). The decompensation rate at final follow-up in these 2 groups were 4% (1/25) and 7.1% (1/14) respectively
with no significant difference (P>0.05).Conclusions Both all pedicle screws and hybrid instrumentation can offer good correction results of the thoracic curve and lumbar curve in posterior selective thoracic fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. While with all pedicle screws
the correction results of the thoracic curve and lumbar curve are both better than those with hybrid instrumentation without increased decompensation rate.
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621