

FOLLOWUS
Published:2007
Scan QR Code
[1].EFFECTS OF GLIBENCLAMIDE, GLIMEPIRIDE, AND GLICLAZIDE ON ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING IN RAT HEART[J].Chinese Medical Sciences Journal,2007(03):162-168.
Guo-ting Wu1, Lin Wang2, Jun Li3, et al. EFFECTS OF GLIBENCLAMIDE, GLIMEPIRIDE, AND GLICLAZIDE ON ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING IN RAT HEART[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2007, (3): 162-168.
[1].EFFECTS OF GLIBENCLAMIDE, GLIMEPIRIDE, AND GLICLAZIDE ON ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING IN RAT HEART[J].Chinese Medical Sciences Journal,2007(03):162-168. DOI:
Guo-ting Wu1, Lin Wang2, Jun Li3, et al. EFFECTS OF GLIBENCLAMIDE, GLIMEPIRIDE, AND GLICLAZIDE ON ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING IN RAT HEART[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2007, (3): 162-168. DOI:
Objective To compare the influence of different sulfonylureas on the myocardial protection effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in isolated rat hearts
and ATP-sensitive potassium channel current (IKATP) of rat ventricular myocytes. Methods Isolated Langendorff perfused rat hearts were randomly assigned to five groups: (1) control group
(2) IPC group
(3) IPC+glibenclamide (GLB
10 μmol/L) group
(4) IPC+glimepiride (GLM
10 μmol/L) group
(5) IPC+gliclazide (GLC
50 μmol/L) group. IPC was defined as 3 cycles of 5-minute zero-flow global ischemia followed by 5-minute reperfusion. The haemodynamic parameters and the infarct size of each isolated heart were recorded. And the sarcolemmal IKATP of dissociated ventricular myocytes reperfused with 10 μmol/L GLB
1 μmol/L GLM
and 1 μmol/L GLC was recorded with single-pipette whole-cell voltage clamp under simulated ischemic condition. Results The infarct sizes of rat hearts in IPC (23.7%±1.3%)
IPC+GLM (24.6%±1.0%)
and IPC+GLC (33.1%±1.3%) groups were all significantly smaller than that in control group (43.3%±1.8%; P<0.01
n=6). The infarct size of rat hearts in IPC+GLB group (40.4%±1.4%) was significantly larger than that in IPC group (P<0.01
n=6). Under simulated ischemic condition
GLB (10 μmol/L) decreased IKATP from 20.65±7.80 to 9.09±0.10 pA/pF (P<0.01
n=6)
GLM (1 μmol/L) did not significantly inhibit IKATP (n=6)
and GLC (1 μmol/L) decreased IKATP from 16.73±0.97 to 11.18±3.56 pA/pF(P<0.05
n=6). Conclusions GLM has less effect on myocardial protection of IPC than GLB and GLC. Blockage of sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive potassium channels in myocardium might play an important role in diminishing IPC-induced protection of GLM
GLB
and GLC.
Objective To compare the influence of different sulfonylureas on the myocardial protection effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in isolated rat hearts
and ATP-sensitive potassium channel current (IKATP) of rat ventricular myocytes. Methods Isolated Langendorff perfused rat hearts were randomly assigned to five groups: (1) control group
(2) IPC group
(3) IPC+glibenclamide (GLB
10 μmol/L) group
(4) IPC+glimepiride (GLM
10 μmol/L) group
(5) IPC+gliclazide (GLC
50 μmol/L) group. IPC was defined as 3 cycles of 5-minute zero-flow global ischemia followed by 5-minute reperfusion. The haemodynamic parameters and the infarct size of each isolated heart were recorded. And the sarcolemmal IKATP of dissociated ventricular myocytes reperfused with 10 μmol/L GLB
1 μmol/L GLM
and 1 μmol/L GLC was recorded with single-pipette whole-cell voltage clamp under simulated ischemic condition. Results The infarct sizes of rat hearts in IPC (23.7%±1.3%)
IPC+GLM (24.6%±1.0%)
and IPC+GLC (33.1%±1.3%) groups were all significantly smaller than that in control group (43.3%±1.8%; P<0.01
n=6). The infarct size of rat hearts in IPC+GLB group (40.4%±1.4%) was significantly larger than that in IPC group (P<0.01
n=6). Under simulated ischemic condition
GLB (10 μmol/L) decreased IKATP from 20.65±7.80 to 9.09±0.10 pA/pF (P<0.01
n=6)
GLM (1 μmol/L) did not significantly inhibit IKATP (n=6)
and GLC (1 μmol/L) decreased IKATP from 16.73±0.97 to 11.18±3.56 pA/pF(P<0.05
n=6). Conclusions GLM has less effect on myocardial protection of IPC than GLB and GLC. Blockage of sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive potassium channels in myocardium might play an important role in diminishing IPC-induced protection of GLM
GLB
and GLC.
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621