

FOLLOWUS
Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
*,E-mail: yuehongzheng@yahoo.com.
Received:02 April 2019,
Accepted:2019-10-7,
Published Online:12 June 2020,
Published:12 June 2020
Scan QR Code
Zhang Xu, Ji Lei, Chen Mengyin, et al. Transarterial Embolization versus Translumber Embolization for Type Ⅱ Endoleak after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2020, 35(2): 135-141.
Zhang Xu, Ji Lei, Chen Mengyin, et al. Transarterial Embolization versus Translumber Embolization for Type Ⅱ Endoleak after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2020, 35(2): 135-141. DOI: 10.24920/003618.
LeFevre ML , Siu AL , Peters JJ , et al . Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement . Ann Intern Med 2014 ; 161 ( 4 ): 281 - 90 . doi: 10.7326/m14-1204 https://dx.doi.org/m14-1204 . DOI: 10.7326/M14-1204 http://doi.org/10.7326/M14-1204 http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M14-1204 http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M14-1204
Patel R , Sweeting MJ , Powell JT , et al . Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial . Lancet 2016 ; 388 ( 10058 ): 2366 - 74 . doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31135-7 https://dx.doi.org/s0140-6736(16)31135-7 . DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31135-7 http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31135-7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27743617 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27743617
Schermerhorn ML , Buck DB , O’Malley AJ , et al . Long-term outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the medicare population . New Eng J Med 2015 ; 373 ( 4 ): 328 - 38 . doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405778 https://dx.doi.org/NEJMoa1405778 . DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405778 http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1405778 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26200979 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26200979
Hobo R , Buth J ; EUROSTAR collaborators . Secondary interventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using current endografts. A EUROSTAR report . J Vasc Surg 2006 ; 43 ( 5 ): 896 - 902 . doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.01.010 https://dx.doi.org/j.jvs.2006.01.010 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.01.010 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.01.010 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16678679 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16678679
Zandvoort HJ , Gonçalves FB , Verhagen HJ , et al. Results of endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms using the Endurant stent graft . J Vasc Surg 2014 ; 59 ( 5 ): 1195 - 202 . doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.031 https://dx.doi.org/j.jvs.2013.12.031 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.031 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.031
Kray J , Kirk S , Franko J , et al . Role of type II endoleak in sac regression after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms . J Vasc Surg 2015 ; 61 ( 4 ): 869 - 74 . doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.003 https://dx.doi.org/j.jvs.2014.11.003 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.003 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.003 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25601501 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25601501
Zhou W , Blay E Jr , Varu V , et al . Outcome and clinical significance of delayed endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair . J Vasc Surg 2014 ; 59 ( 4 ): 915 - 20 . doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.093 https://dx.doi.org/j.jvs.2013.10.093 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.093 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.093
Chaikof EL , Brewster DC , Dalman RL , et al . The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm . J Vasc Surg 2018 ; 67 ( 1 ): 2 - 77 . doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044 https://dx.doi.org/j.jvs.2017.10.044 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29268916 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29268916
Jones JE , Atkins MD , Brewster DC , et al . Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes . J Vasc Surg 2007 ; 46 ( 1 ): 1 - 8 . doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.073 https://dx.doi.org/j.jvs.2007.02.073 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.073 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.073 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521407004260 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521407004260
Sidloff DA , Stather PW , Choke E , et al . Type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair . Br J Surg 2013 ; 100 ( 10 ): 1262 - 70 . doi: 10.1002/bjs.9181 https://dx.doi.org/bjs.9181 . DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9181 http://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9181 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23939840 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23939840
Ultee KHJ , Büttner S , Huurman R , et al . Editor’s Choice: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of treatment for type Ⅱ endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018 ; 56 ( 6 ): 794 - 807 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.06.009 https://dx.doi.org/j.ejvs.2018.06.009 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.06.009 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.06.009 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30104089 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30104089
Liberati A , Altman DG , Tetzlaff J , et al . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration . BMJ 2009 ; 339 : b2700 . doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700 https://dx.doi.org/bmj.b2700 . DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2700 http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19622552 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19622552
Parodi JC , Palmaz JC , Barone HD . Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms . Ann Vasc Surg 1991 ; 5 ( 6 ): 491 - 9 . doi: 10.1007/bf02015271 https://dx.doi.org/bf02015271 . DOI: 10.1007/BF02015271 http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015271 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1837729 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1837729
Zaiem F , Almasri J , Tello M , et al . A systematic review of surveillance after endovascular aortic repair . J Vasc Surg 2018 ; 67 ( 1 ): 320 - 31 . doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.058 https://dx.doi.org/j.jvs.2017.04.058 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.058 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.058 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662928 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662928
Gelfand DV , White GH , Wilson SE . Clinical significance of type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm . Ann Vasc Surg 2006 ; 20 ( 1 ): 69 - 74 . doi: 10.1007/s10016-005-9382-z https://dx.doi.org/s10016-005-9382-z . DOI: 10.1007/s10016-005-9382-z http://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-005-9382-z http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509606613149 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509606613149
Choke E , Thompson M . Endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: current concepts . J Cardiovasc Surg 2004 ; 45 ( 4 ): 349 - 66 .
Manunga JM , Cragg A , Garberich R , et al . Preoperative inferior mesenteric artery embolization: A valid method to reduce the rate of type Ⅱ endoleak after EVAR? Ann Vasc Surg 2017 ; 39 : 40 - 7 . doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.05.106 https://dx.doi.org/j.avsg.2016.05.106 . DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.05.106 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2016.05.106 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27531083 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27531083
Walker J , Tucker LY , Goodney P , et al . Type II endoleak with or without intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair does not change aneurysm-related outcomes despite sac growth . J Vasc Surg 2015 ; 62 ( 3 ): 551 - 61 . doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.389 https://dx.doi.org/j.jvs.2015.04.389 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.389 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.389 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26059094 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26059094
van Marrewijk CJ , Fransen G , Laheij RJ , et al . Is a type Ⅱ endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004 ; 27 ( 2 ): 128 - 37 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.10.016 https://dx.doi.org/j.ejvs.2003.10.016 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.10.016 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.10.016 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14718893 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14718893
van der Laan MJ , Bartels LW , Viergever MA , et al . Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging of endoleaks after EVAR . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006 ; 32 ( 4 ): 361 - 65 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.02.011 https://dx.doi.org/j.ejvs.2006.02.011 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.02.011 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.02.011 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16630731 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16630731
Habets J , Zandvoort HJ , Reitsma JB , et al . Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013 ; 45 ( 4 ): 340 - 50 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.12.014 https://dx.doi.org/j.ejvs.2012.12.014 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.12.014 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.12.014 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403221 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403221
Aziz A , Menias CO , Sanchez LA , et al . Outcomes of percutaneous endovascular intervention for type II endoleak with aneurysm expansion . J Vasc Surg 2012 ; 55 ( 5 ): 1263 - 67 . doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.131 https://dx.doi.org/j.jvs.2011.10.131 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.131 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.131
Patatas K , Ling L , Dunning J , et al . Static sac size with a type Ⅱ endoleak post-endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: surveillance or embolization? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012 ; 15 ( 3 ): 462 - 6 . doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs201 https://dx.doi.org/icvts/ivs201 . DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs201 http://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivs201 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22617500 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22617500
Moll FL , Powell JT , Fraedrich G , et al . Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011 ; 41 ( S1 ): S1 - 58 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.011 https://dx.doi.org/j.ejvs.2010.09.011 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.011 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.011 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1078588410005605 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1078588410005605
Karthikesalingam A , Thrumurthy SG , Jackson D , et al . Current evidence is insufficient to define an optimal threshold for intervention in isolated type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair . J Endovasc Ther 2012 ; 19 ( 2 ): 200 - 8 . doi: 10.1583/11-3762R.1 https://dx.doi.org/11-3762R.1 . DOI: 10.1583/11-3762R.1 http://doi.org/10.1583/11-3762R.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22545885 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22545885
Arko FR , Filis KA , Siedel SA , et al . Intrasac flow velocities predict sealing of type Ⅱ endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair . J Vasc Surg 2003 ; 37 ( 1 ): 8 - 15 . doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.55 https://dx.doi.org/mva.2003.55 . DOI: 10.1067/mva.2003.55 http://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2003.55 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12514572 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12514572
Rial R , Serrano Fj Fj , Vega M , et al . Treatment of type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: translumbar puncture and injection of thrombin into the aneurysm sac . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004 ; 27 ( 3 ): 333 - 5 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.11.005 https://dx.doi.org/j.ejvs.2003.11.005 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.11.005 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.11.005 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14760606 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14760606
Steinmetz E , Rubin BG , Sanchez LA , et al . Type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective . J Vasc Surg 2004 ; 39 ( 2 ): 306 - 13 . doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.10.026 https://dx.doi.org/j.jvs.2003.10.026 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.10.026 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2003.10.026 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14743129 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14743129
Stavropoulos SW , Park J , Fairman R , et al . Type 2 endoleak embolization comparison: translumbar embolization versus modified transarterial embolization . J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009 ; 20 ( 10 ): 1299 - 302 . doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.07.003 https://dx.doi.org/j.jvir.2009.07.003 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.07.003 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2009.07.003 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051044309006964 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051044309006964
Marcelin C , Le Bras Y , Petitpierre F , et al . Safety and efficacy of embolization using Onyx((R)) of persistent type II endoleaks after abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair . Diagn Interv Imaging 2017 ; 98 ( 6 ): 491 - 97 . doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.01.003 https://dx.doi.org/j.diii.2017.01.003 . DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.01.003 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2017.01.003 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196614 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196614
Haq IU , Kelay A , Davis M , et al . Ten-year single-centre experience with type Ⅱ endoleaks: Intervention versus observation . Vasc Med 2017 ; 22 ( 4 ): 316 - 23 . doi: 10.1177/1358863x17704315 https://dx.doi.org/1358863x17704315 . DOI: 10.1177/1358863X17704315 http://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X17704315 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28436300 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28436300
Massis K , Carson WG 3rd , Rozas A , et al . Treatment of type Ⅱ endoleaks with ethylene-vinyl-alcohol copolymer (Onyx) . Vasc Endovascular Surg 2012 ; 46 ( 3 ): 251 - 57 . doi: 10.1177/1538574412442401 https://dx.doi.org/1538574412442401 . DOI: 10.1177/1538574412442401 http://doi.org/10.1177/1538574412442401 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22492111 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22492111
Nevala T , Biancari F , Manninen H , et al . Type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: effectiveness of embolization . Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010 ; 33 ( 4 ): 278 - 84 . doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9685-5 https://dx.doi.org/s00270-009-9685-5 . DOI: 10.1007/s00270-009-9685-5 http://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9685-5 http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00270-009-9685-5 http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00270-009-9685-5
Baum RA , Carpenter JP , Golden MA , et al . Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques . J Vasc Surg 2002 ; 35 ( 1 ): 23 - 29 . doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.121068 https://dx.doi.org/mva.2002.121068 . DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.121068 http://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.121068 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11802129 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11802129
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621