Efficacy and Safety of a Continuous Wound Catheter in Open Abdominal Partial Hepatectomy

Che Lu; Lu Xin; Pei Li-jian

doi:10.24920/J1001-9294.2017.024

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Efficacy and Safety of a Continuous Wound Catheter in Open Abdominal Partial Hepatectomy

Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Vol. 32, Issue 3, Pages: 171-176(2017)

Orginal Article | Updated：2024-04-10

- Efficacy and Safety of a Continuous Wound Catheter in Open Abdominal Partial Hepatectomy
- Affiliations：
  
  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
  2. 2Department of Hepatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
- Author bio：
  
  *Corresponding author Tel: 86-10-69152020, E-mail: peilj@pumch.cn
- Funds：
- DOI：10.24920/J1001-9294.2017.024
  CLC：
- Received：05 February 2017，
  
  Published Online：26 September 2017，
  
  Published：2017-09
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
Che Lu, Lu Xin, Pei Li-jian. Efficacy and Safety of a Continuous Wound Catheter in Open Abdominal Partial Hepatectomy[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2017, 32(3): 171-176.
DOI：

Che Lu, Lu Xin, Pei Li-jian. Efficacy and Safety of a Continuous Wound Catheter in Open Abdominal Partial Hepatectomy[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2017, 32(3): 171-176. DOI： 10.24920/J1001-9294.2017.024.

摘要

目的

研究在开腹肝切除手术的患者中使用伤口置管持续浸润镇痛的有效性和安全性。

方法

本研究为前瞻非对照队列研究。计划实施开腹部分肝切除手术的患者在充分知情同意后自愿选择进入伤口置管持续浸润镇痛组（CWC），患者自控硬膜外镇痛组（PCEA），患者自控静脉吗啡组（PCIAM），和患者自控静脉舒芬组（PCIAS）。主要研究终点为术后4、12、24、48、72 h静息疼痛和活动疼痛的疼痛评分。次要研究终点为疼痛补救药物的使用，镇痛药物副作用和镇痛管理相关并发症的发生率。

结果

在2013年8月至2013年12月期间，共有80例患者满足入组标准。10例患者进入了CWC组，22例进入PCEA组，29例进入PCIAM组，19例进入PCIAS组。在对年龄，性别，身体质量指数，肝切除比例，手术时间，阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑与信息量表评分等因素进行了矫正后，CWC组和PCEA

PCIAM

PCIAS各组间的静息疼痛和活动疼痛评分的差异在术后各个时间点无统计学意义 (P

0.05) 。CWC组在术后24、48和72 h对补救药物的需求和其他各组的差异无统计学意义(P

0.05)。CWC组术后恶心呕吐发生率和术后恢复排气时间与其他各组的差异无统计学意义(P

0.05)。所有研究入组的患者在研究期间未发生与持续伤口置管相关的并发症。

结论

CWC与传统临床使用的术后镇痛模式比较，在镇痛效力方面无显著差异。对于开腹肝脏手术患者，CWC是一种安全的术后镇痛模式。

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous local anesthetic wound infiltration following open abdominal partial hepatectomy.

Methods

We performed a prospective

non-randomized

concurrent and controlled study. Patients undergoing open abdominal partial hepatectomy

according to their willingness

accepted one of the following managements for the postoperative pain: continuous wound catheter (CWC) infiltration

patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA)

patient-controlled intravenous analgesia of morphine (PCIAM)

and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia of sufentanil (PCIAS). The primary outcome was postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at rest and on movement. Secondary outcomes included consumption of rescue medication

side effects

and complications associated with postoperative pain management.

Results

From August 2013 to December 2013

80 patients were allocated to receive CWC (

=10)

PCEA (

=22)

PCIAM (

=29)

or PCIAS (

=19). After adjusting for age

sex

body mass index

percentage of resected liver

operation time

and Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale

there was no significant difference in the VAS scores at rest or on movement between Group CWC and the other groups

namely PCEA

PCIAM

and PCIAS

at 4

and 72 hours postoperatively (all

0.05). The need for rescue medication was not significantly different between Group CWC and the other three groups at 48 and 72 hours postoperatively (all

0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting or anal exsufflation time between group CWC and the other three groups (all

0.05). No severe adverse effects associated with continuous wound infiltration were observed during the study period.

Conclusions

CWC has a comparable analgesic effect compared with traditional analgesia methods at most time points postoperatively. CWC is a safe alternative for the postoperative analgesic management of open liver surgery.

关键词

Keywords

references

Holtzman S , Clarke HA , McCluskey SA, Turcotte K, Grant D, Katz J. Acute and chronic postsurgical pain after living liver donation: incidence and predictors. Liver Transpl 2014 ; 20 ( 11 ): 1336 - 46 . doi: 10.1002/lt.23949 10.1002/lt.23949 .

Soyama A , Takatsuki M , Hidaka M , Imamura H , Kuroki T , Eguchi S. Acute and chronic postsurgical pain after living liver donation: incidence and predictors. Liver Transpl 2015 ; 21 ( 8 ): 1109 . doi: 10.1002/lt.24125 10.1002/lt.24125 .

Khan J , Katz J , Montbriand J , Ladak S , McCluskey S, Srinivas C, et al. Surgically placed abdominal wall catheters on postoperative analgesia and outcomes after living liver donation. Liver Transpl 2015 ; 21 ( 4 ): 478 - 86 . doi: 10.1002/lt.24073 10.1002/lt.24073 .

Moerman N , van Dam FS , Muller MJ , Oosting H . The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Anesth Analg 1996 ; 82 ( 3 ): 445 - 51 .

Kaibori M , Matsui K , Ishizaki M , Iida H , Yoshii K , Asano H , et al. Effects of implementing an "enhanced recovery after surgery" program on patients undergoing resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Today 2017 ; 47 ( 1 ): 42 - 51 . doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1344-2 10.1007/s00595-016-1344-2 .

Yip VS , Dunne DF , Samuels S , Tan CY , Lacasia C , Tang J , et al. Adherence to early mobilisation: key for successful enhanced recovery after liver resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016 ; 42 ( 10 ): 1561 - 7 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejso. 2016.07.015 10.1016/j.ejso. 2016.07.015 .

Telletxea S , Gonzalez J , Portugal V , Alvarez R , Aguirre U , Anton A , et al. Analgesia with interfascial continuous wound infiltration after laparoscopic colon surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2016 ; 63 ( 4 ): 197 - 206 . doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2015.07.008 10.1016/j.redar.2015.07.008 .

Lenz N , Hirschburger M , Roehrig R , Menges T , Mueller M , Padberg W , et al. Application of continuous wound-infusion catheters in lung transplantation: a retrospective data analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017 ; 65 ( 5 ): 403 - 9 . doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580621 10.1055/s-0036-1580621 .

Ball L , Pellerano G , Corsi L , Giudici N , Pellegrino A , Cannata D , et al. Continuous epidural versus wound infusion plus single morphine bolus as postoperative analgesia in open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Minerva Anestesiol 2016 ; 82 ( 12 ): 1296 - 305 .

Mungroop TH , Veelo DP , Busch OR, van Dieren S, van Gulik TM, Karsten TM, et al. Continuous wound infiltration or epidural analgesia for pain prevention after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery within an enhanced recovery program (POP-UP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015 ; 16 : 562 . doi: 10.1186/s13063- 015-1075-5 10.1186/s13063- 015-1075-5 .

Liu SS , Richman JM , Thirlby RC , Wu CL. Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg 2006 ; 203 ( 6 ): 914 - 32 . doi: 10.1016/j. jamcollsurg. 2006.08.007 10.1016/j. jamcollsurg. 2006.08.007 .

Hughes MJ , Harrison EM , Peel NJ , Stutchfield B , McNally S, Beattie C, et al. Randomized clinical trial of perioperative nerve block and continuous local anaesthetic infiltration via wound catheter versus epidural analgesia in open liver resection (LIVER 2 trial). Br J Surg 2015 ; 102 ( 13 ): 1619 - 28 . doi: 10.1002/bjs.9949 10.1002/bjs.9949 .

Gebhart GF , Bielefeldt K. Physiology of visceral pain. Compr Physiol 2016 ; 6 ( 4 ): 1609 - 33 . doi: 10.1002/cphy. c150049 10.1002/cphy. c150049 .

Esteve N , Ferrer A , Sansaloni C , Mariscal M , Torres M , Mora C. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia in liver resection: safety and effectiveness. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2017 ; 64 ( 2 ): 86 - 94 . doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2016. 06.006 10.1016/j.redar.2016. 06.006 .

Ganapathi S , Roberts G , Mogford S , Bahlmann B , Ateleanu B , Kumar N. Epidural analgesia provides effective pain relief in patients undergoing open liver surgery. Br J Pain 2015 ; 9 ( 2 ): 78 - 85 . doi: 10.1177/ 2049463714525140 10.1177/ 2049463714525140 .

Schumann R , Zabala L , Angelis M , Bonney I , Tighiouart H , Carr DB. Altered hematologic profiles following donor right hepatectomy and implications for perioperative analgesic management. Liver Transpl 2004 ; 10 ( 3 ): 363 - 8 . doi: 10.1002/lt.20059 10.1002/lt.20059 .

Kambakamba P , Slankamenac K , Tschuor C , Kron P , Wirsching A , Maurer K , et al. Epidural analgesia and perioperative kidney function after major liver resection. Br J Surg 2015 ; 102 ( 7 ): 805 - 12 . doi: 10.1002/bjs.9810 10.1002/bjs.9810 .

Melloul E , Hubner M , Scott M , Snowden C , Prentis J , Dejong CH , et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. World J Surg 2016 ; 40 ( 10 ): 2425 - 40 . doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3700-1 10.1007/s00268-016-3700-1 .

Views

1163

Downloads

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

Submit

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰