ASSESSING THE RESECTABILITY OF PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA:COMPARISION OF DUAL- PHASE HELICAL CT ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY WITH CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY
中国医学科学杂志(英文版)2001年0卷第1期 页码:40-45
Updated:2024-04-10
|
Share with wechat friends or circle of friends
Export references
ASSESSING THE RESECTABILITY OF PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA:COMPARISION OF DUAL- PHASE HELICAL CT ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY WITH CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY
Affiliations:
Author bio:
Funds:
DOI:
中图分类号:R735.9
纸质出版日期:2001
Accepted:
Scan QR Code
ASSESSING THE RESECTABILITY OF PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA:COMPARISION OF DUAL- PHASE HELICAL CT ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY WITH CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY[J]. 中国医学科学杂志(英文版), 2001,0(1):40-45.
ASSESSING THE RESECTABILITY OF PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA:COMPARISION OF DUAL- PHASE HELICAL CT ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY WITH CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2001, 0(1): 40-45.
ASSESSING THE RESECTABILITY OF PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA:COMPARISION OF DUAL- PHASE HELICAL CT ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY WITH CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY[J]. 中国医学科学杂志(英文版), 2001,0(1):40-45.DOI:
ASSESSING THE RESECTABILITY OF PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA:COMPARISION OF DUAL- PHASE HELICAL CT ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY WITH CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2001, 0(1): 40-45.DOI:
ASSESSING THE RESECTABILITY OF PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA:COMPARISION OF DUAL- PHASE HELICAL CT ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY WITH CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY
摘要
Abstract
To evaluate the respective value of dual- phase helical CT arterial portography (CTAP) and conventional angiography in preoperative predicting resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Subjects and methods. Tumor resectability was prospectively evaluated in 54 patients with pathologically proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who later underwent surgery. Both dual- phase helical CT scanning and selective angiography were obtained in each patient preoperatively. For optimal enhancement of pancreas and major peripancreatic vessels
two catheters connected to an automatic injector via a Y- shaped tube were placed after selective angiography
one in celiac trunk
the other in superior mesenteric artery. Then the patient underwent dual- phase helical CTAP of pancreas and liver. The criteria of irresectability for CTAP include: tumor diameter≥ 5 cm
extrapancreatic invasion
distant metastases and vascular involvement(occlusion
stenosis or semicircular encasement of superior mesenteric artery
hepatic artery
splenic artery
celiac axis; portal vein
superior mesenteric vein or splenic vein). The results of both modalities were correlated with findings from surgery or pathology. Results. Thirty- eight of 54 patients had nonresectable disease. In prediction the irresectability
sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value
negative predictive value and overall accuracy were 94.7%
100%
100%
88.9%
96.3% respectively for helical CTAP and 63.2%
93.8%
96.0%
51.7%
72.2% respectively for selective angiography. In assessing vascular involvements
dual- phase helical CTAP was also superior to selective angiography. Conclusion. Dual- phase helical CTAP is superior to angiography in assessing resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The combination of the two modalities may further improve overall accuracy of assessment.