
FOLLOWUS
1. Department of Neurosurgery
2. Beijing Hospital
3. No. 2 People’ s Hospital of Dalian
4. Department of Neurology
5. No. 306 Hospital of PLA Beijing,100730
6. ,China
纸质出版日期:2003
Scan QR Code
[1]王大明,凌锋,李萌,王安顺,蔡艺龄.INITIAL COMPARISON OF INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION WITH MECHANICAL DETACHABLE SPIRALS AND WITH GUGLIELMI DETACHABLE COILS[J].Chinese Medical Sciences Journal,2003(01):59-62.
INITIAL COMPARISON OF INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMEMBOLIZATION WITH MECHANICAL DETACHABLE SPIRALSAND WITH GUGLIELMI DETACHABLE COILS[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2003, (1): 59-62.
[1]王大明,凌锋,李萌,王安顺,蔡艺龄.INITIAL COMPARISON OF INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION WITH MECHANICAL DETACHABLE SPIRALS AND WITH GUGLIELMI DETACHABLE COILS[J].Chinese Medical Sciences Journal,2003(01):59-62. DOI:
INITIAL COMPARISON OF INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMEMBOLIZATION WITH MECHANICAL DETACHABLE SPIRALSAND WITH GUGLIELMI DETACHABLE COILS[J]. Chinese medical sciences journal, 2003, (1): 59-62. DOI:
<正> Objective. To compare the embolization effects of intracranial aneurysms with mechanical detachable spirals (MDS) and with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDC).Methods. One hundred and twenty cases with 125 intracranial aneurysms were embolized in Beijing Hospital from March 1995 to July 1999. Sixty - six aneurysms in 64 cases were embolized with MDS
51 in 48 with GDC
and 8 in 8 with both MDS and GDC. Clinical data including sex
age
subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)
Hunt & Hess grading
diameter and neck width of aneurysms
number and length of coils used per aneurysm
occlusive ratio
and complications were compared between MDS and GDC groups.Results. MDS and GDC groups were comparable (t-test or x2 -test
all P value > 0. 10) in terms of age
sex
diameter of aneurysms [ (8. 46 ± 3. 42) mm vs. (7. 38 ± 3. 45) mm]
neck width [ (3. 49 ± 1. 50) mm vs. (3. 26 ± 1. 52) mm]
coils number[ (4. 65 ± 3. 01) vs. (4. 24 ± 2. 65) ] and their length[ (460. 2 ± 398. 5) mm vs. (422. 9 ±387. 1) mm] used per ane
Objective. To compare the embolization effects of intracranial aneurysms with mechanical detachable spirals (MDS) and with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDC).Methods. One hundred and twenty cases with 125 intracranial aneurysms were embolized in Beijing Hospital from March 1995 to July 1999. Sixty - six aneurysms in 64 cases were embolized with MDS
51 in 48 with GDC
and 8 in 8 with both MDS and GDC. Clinical data including sex
age
subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)
Hunt & Hess grading
diameter and neck width of aneurysms
number and length of coils used per aneurysm
occlusive ratio
and complications were compared between MDS and GDC groups.Results. MDS and GDC groups were comparable (t-test or x2 -test
all P value > 0. 10) in terms of age
sex
diameter of aneurysms [ (8. 46 ± 3. 42) mm vs. (7. 38 ± 3. 45) mm]
neck width [ (3. 49 ± 1. 50) mm vs. (3. 26 ± 1. 52) mm]
coils number[ (4. 65 ± 3. 01) vs. (4. 24 ± 2. 65) ] and their length[ (460. 2 ± 398. 5) mm vs. (422. 9 ±387. 1) mm] used per aneurysm
occlusive ratio in aneurysms embolized ≥80% [ (95. 00% ± 6. 32% ) vs. (94. 19% ± 7. 63% ) ]
mortality and permanent complications (7. 8% vs. 4. 2% ).Conclusions. MDS and GDC are all materials for embolization of intracranial aneurysms. MDS is less expensive
but more difficult to control and of propensity to complications while GDC is more compliant
easier to be used
safer
and have many alternative types for use as well as more extensive indications.
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621