Chinese Medical Sciences Journal ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 265-272.doi: 10.24920/004282

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

肌肉超声束颤定量分析有助于肌萎缩侧索硬化的鉴别诊断

樊静1,李亦2,牛静雯1,胡南1,管宇宙1,崔丽英1,刘明生1,*()   

  1. 1中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院,北京协和医院神经内科,北京 100730
    2浙江大学医学院附属第一医院神经内科,杭州 310000
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-10 接受日期:2023-09-08 出版日期:2023-12-30 发布日期:2023-10-09
  • 通讯作者: 刘明生 E-mail:liumingsheng_pumch@163.com

Differentiation Between Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Mimics Using Quantitative Analysis of Fasciculation with Muscle Ultrasound

Jing Fan1,Yi Li2,Jing-Wen Niu1,Nan Hu1,Yu-Zhou Guan1,Li-Ying Cui1,Ming-Sheng Liu1,*()   

  1. 1Department of Neurology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730
    2Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000
  • Received:2023-07-10 Accepted:2023-09-08 Published:2023-12-30 Online:2023-10-09
  • Contact: Ming-Sheng Liu E-mail:liumingsheng_pumch@163.com

摘要:

目的 研究超声束颤对肌萎缩侧索硬化(amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,ALS)的鉴别诊断价值。

方法 前瞻性收集2017年至2020年在北京协和医院就诊的ALS患者,同时招募神经根神经病患者及健康者分别作为病例对照组和健康对照组。采用医学研究会(Medical Research Council,MRC)量表评估肌力。采用肌肉超声评估ALS及病例对照组患者双侧上下肢16组肌群的最大束颤级别、束颤总分及束颤级别。采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)分析评估最大束颤级别、束颤总分及束颤级别诊断ALS的特异度和敏感度。

结果 束颤最大级别大于2级的ALS患者和神经根神经病患者的比例分别为84.9%的和9.8%,两者比较具有统计学意义(χ2 = 101.3,P < 0.001)。ALS和神经根神经病患者的束颤总分分别为29(15,41)和3(0,8)[中位数(四分位数间距)]。ALS患者中,MRC评分为2和4分患者的肌肉束颤最明显,MRC评分为5分患者的肌肉束颤次之,MRC评分为0和1患者的肌肉束颤最不明显。束颤总分诊断ALS的敏感性和特异性分别为80.6%和93.4%(截断值为14)。对于ALS 患者,MRC评分为4和5的肌肉中,肌肉束颤级别≥3的比例分别为42.3%和24.1%;对于神经根神经病患者,MRC评分为4和5的肌肉中,肌肉束颤级别≥3的比例仅为1.7%和0。

结论 肌肉束颤级别联合肌肉MRC评分有助于ALS的鉴别诊断。

关键词: 肌萎缩侧索硬化, 神经根神经病, 肌肉超声, 束颤, 肌力

Abstract:

Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the intensity of fasciculation evaluated by muscle ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Methods We prospectively recruited patients who had ALS and neuropathy-radiculopathy attending Peking Union Medical College Hospital from 2017 to 2020. Healthy adults from a community were recruited as healthy controls. Muscle strength was assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. At the first visit to the hospital, patients were assessed for maximal grade of fasciculations, total fasciculation score, and fasciculation grade in 16 muscle groups of bilateral upper and lower limbs using ultrasonography. The sensitivity and specificity of maximal grade of fasciculations, total fasciculation score, and fasciculation grade for the diagnosis of ALS were assessed by receiver operating characteristic analyses.

Results The percentage of limb muscles with a maximal fasciculation grade higher than grade 2 in ALS patients and neuropathy-radiculopathy patients was 84.9% and 9.8%, respectively (χ2 = 172.436, P < 0.01). Of the 16 limb muscles detected, the total fasciculation score [median (interquartile range)] was 29 (15, 41) in ALS patients and 3 (0, 8) in neuropathy-radiculopathy patients (Z = 9.642, P < 0.001). Remarkable fasciculations were seen in ALS patients whose muscles with a MRC score ranging from 2 to 4, followed by patients with MRC score 5, and then in those with MRC score 0 and 1. The sensitivity and specificity of total fasciculation score for diagnosis of ALS were 80.6% and 93.4%, respectively (cut-off value 14). In patients with ALS, for muscles with MRC score 4 and 5, the percentage of muscles with fasciculation grades ≥ 3 was 42.3% and 24.1% respectively, while in neuropathy-radiculopathy patients, the percentage for muscles with MRC score 4 and 5 was only 1.7% and 0, respectively.

Conclusion A combined analysis of fasciculation intensity and MRC score of the limb muscles may be helpful for differential diagnosis of ALS.

Key words: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, neuropathy-radiculopathy, muscle ultrasonography, fasciculation, muscle strength

Copyright © 2018 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. All right reserved.
 
www.cmsj.cams.cn
京公安备110402430088 京ICP备06002729号-1  Powered by Magtech.

Supervised by National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China

9 Dongdan Santiao, Dongcheng district, Beijing, 100730 China

Tel: 86-10-65105897  Fax:86-10-65133074 

E-mail: cmsj@cams.cn  www.cmsj.cams.cn

Copyright © 2018 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

All right reserved.

京公安备110402430088  京ICP备06002729号-1