1. Emmady PD, Anilkumar AC. EEG Abnormal Waveforms. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. [Updated 2023 May 1].Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557655/ 2. Zelmann R, Paulk AC, Basu I, et al.CLoSES: A platform for closed-loop intracranial stimulation in humans. Neuroimage 2020;223:117314. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117314. 3. Li C, Zhao W.Progress in the brain-computer interface: an interview with Bin He. Natl Sci Rev 2020; 7(2):480-3. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz152. 4. UNESCO University of Milan-Bicocca (Italy), State University of New York. Downstate Health Sciences University. The risks and challenges of neurotechnologies for human rights. Paris: the Organization and the universities; 2023. Available from: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/risks-and-challenges-neurotechnologies-human-rights?hub=83294. doi:10.54678/POGS7778 5. Liu XX, Gao T, Lu TS, et al.China Brain Project: from bench to bedside. Sci Bull (Beijing) 2023; 68(5): 444-7. 6. Lu L, Liu XX, Yuan K.Progress of Chinese Brain Science program. J Peking University (Med) 2022; 54(5): 791-5. 7. The brain neural regulation of frontier development white paper machine interaction (2022). (2023-02-12) [2024-04-07]. Available from https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/605777220 8. Pizzolato C, Gunduz M A, Palipana D, et al.Non-invasive approaches to functional recovery after spinal cord injury: Therapeutic targets and multimodal device interventions. Exp Neurol 2021;339:113612. 9. Zhang S J, Zhao C L, Ning W C, et al.Ethical risks and countermeasures of brain-computer interface technology. Chin J Med Ethics, 2024, 37(01): 61-68. (in Chinese) 10. State Council of the People's Republic of China. Outline of the "13th Five-Year" Plan [EB/OL]. (2016-03-17) [2022-06-01]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-03/17/content_5054992.htm. 11. DiLuca M, Olesen J. The cost of brain diseases: a burden or a challenge? Neuron 2014; 82(6):1205-8. 12. Feigin VL, Vos T, Nichols E, et al.The global burden of neurological disorders: translating evidence into policy. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19(3): 255-65. 13. International Bioethics Committee. Report of the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO (IBC) on the ethical issues of neurotechnology. (2021-12-15) [2024-04-07]. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378724?posInSet=2&queryId=8145220a-103e-415d-9b01-1992d70de059. 14. Release of the first ethical principles and governance recommendations document for the brain-computer interface field in China. (2023-05-30) [2023-06-17]. Available from: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1767296061170347956&wfr=spider&for=pc. 15. National Science and Technology Ethics Committee. Guidelines on the Ethics of Brain-Computer Interface Research.(2024-02-06)[2024-02-27]. https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202402/content_6930611.htm. 16. Xiao F.From technical ethics to brain-computer interface ethics. Stud Dialectics Nat 2023; 39(8): 63-68. doi:10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2023.08.009. 17. Burwell S, Sample M, Racine E.Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review. BMC Med Ethics 2017; 18(1): 60. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0220-y. 18. Zhang Z, Chen YX, Zhao X, et al.Ethical considerations of medical applications of implantable brain-computer interfaces. J Biomed Eng 2024; 41(01): 177-183. 19. Jarosiewicz B, Sarma AA, Bacher D, et al. Virtual typing by people with tetraplegia using a self-calibrating intracortical brain-computer interface. Sci Transl Med2015; 7(313):313ra179. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac7328. 20. Downey JE, Schwed N, Chase SM, et al. Intracortical recording stability in human brain-computer interface users. J Neural Eng 2018; 15(4): 046016. 21. Milekovic T, Sarma AA, Bacher D, et al. Stable long-term BCIenabled communication in ALS and locked-in syndrome using LFP signals. J Neurophysiol 2018; 120(1): 343-60. 22. Perge JA, Zhang S, Malik WQ, et al. Reliability of directional information in unsorted spikes and local field potentials recorded in human motor cortex. J Neural Eng 2014; 11(4): 046007. 23. Perge JA, Homer ML, Malik WQ, et al. Intra-day signal instabilities affect decoding performance in an intracortical neural interface system. J Neural Eng 2013; 10(3): 036004 24. Kumar A.Risk and benefit analysis of medicines. J Int Med Res 2020;48(1):300060518771424. doi: 10.1177/0300060518771424. Erratum in: J Int Med Res 2020;48(2):300060518793548. 25. Saal J, Ottenhoff MC, Kubben PL, et al.Towards hippocampal navigation for brain-computer interfaces. Sci Rep 2023;13(1):14021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40282-7. 26. Kuzovkin I, Tretyakov K, Uusberg A, et al.Mental state space visualization for interactive modeling of personalized BCI control strategies. J Neural Eng 2020; 17(1):016059. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab6d0b. 27. Klein E, Ojemann J.Informed consent in implantable BCI research: identification of research risks and recommendations for development of best practices. J Neural Eng 2016; 13(4):043001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/4/043001. 28. Agarwal A, Dowsley R, McKinney ND, et al. Protecting Privacy of Users in Brain-Computer Interface Applications. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2019;27(8):1546-55. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2926965. 29. Wu X, Zhang D, Li G, et al.Data augmentation for invasive brain-computer interfaces based on stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG). J Neural Eng 2024; 21(1). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad200e. 30. Ajrawi S, Rao R, Sarkar M.Cybersecurity in Brain Computer Interfaces: RFID-based design-theoretical framework. Inform Med Unlocked 2021; 22: 100489. doi:10.1016/j.imu.2020.100489. 31. Pugh J, Pycroft L, Sandberg A, et al.Brainjacking in deep brain stimulation and autonomy. Ethics Inf Technol. 2018;20(3):219-32. doi: 10.1007/s10676-018-9466-4. 32. Specker Sullivan L, Illes J. Ethics in published brain-computer interface research. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(1):013001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa8e05. 33. Mitchell P, Lee SCM, Yoo PE, et al. Assessment of Safety of a Fully Implanted Endovascular Brain-Computer Interface for Severe Paralysis in 4 Patients: The Stentrode With Thought-Controlled Digital Switch (SWITCH) Study. JAMA Neurol 2023; 80(3):270-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.4847. 34. Jiang L, Stocco A, Losey DM, et al. BrainNet: A Multi-Person Brain-to-Brain Interface for Direct Collaboration Between Brains. Sci Rep 2019; 9(1):6115. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41895-7. 35. Hildt E. Multi-Person Brain-To-Brain Interfaces: Ethical Issues. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:1177. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01177. 36. Klein E. Informed Consent in Implantable BCI Research: Identifying Risks and Exploring Meaning. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016; 22(5):1299-1317. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9712-7. 37. Wang XQ, Meng LJ, Sun HQ, et al. Consensus of multidisciplinary ethical review experts on brain computer interface clinical research. Chin Med Ethics; 2024: 1-13. in Chinese. (2024-4-29)[2024-05-11]. Available from: http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1203.r.20240428.1839.002.html. 38. Rodrigues PLC, Congedo M, Jutten C. Dimensionality Transcending: A Method for Merging BCI Datasets With Different Dimensionalities. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2021; 68(2):673-84. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.3010854. 39. Bai Jing. Ethical Considerations of Cross Kidney Transplants.Shanxi University's 2008 National Doctoral Forum on the Philosophy of Science and Technology. Ed: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Department of Social Sciences of the Faculty of Humanities. 2008, 479-487. In Chinese. 40. Zhao H. The conflict of missions between technology and humanities. Chinese Hospital Director 2011; (8):14. 41. Tang SK, Zhong YM. Observations on the integration and dissemination model of teams within and outside the scientific community based on "dialogue theory". China Science Fund 2023; 37(6):986-95. doi:10.16262/j.cnki.1000-8217.2023.06.011. 42. van Stuijvenberg OC, Broekman MLD, Wolff SEC, et al. Developer perspectives on the ethics of AI-driven neural implants: a qualitative study. Sci Rep 2024; 14(1):7880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58535-4. |