1. |
Varner M. Cesarean scar imaging and prediction of subsequent obstetric complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 55(4):988-96. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318263c699.
doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318263c699
|
2. |
Rodgers SK, Kirby CL, Smith RJ, et al. Imaging after cesarean delivery: acute and chronic complications. Radiographics 2012; 32(6):1693-712. doi: 10.1148/rg.326125516.
doi: 10.1148/rg.326125516
pmid: 23065165
|
3. |
Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm birth and neonatal death: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2003; 327(7410):313. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7410.313.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7410.313
|
4. |
Bujold E, Mehta SH, Bujold C, et al. Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187(5):1199-202. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127138.
doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127138
|
5. |
Shipp TD, Zelop CM, Repke JT, et al. Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97(2):175-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01129-7.
doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01129-7
pmid: 11165577
|
6. |
Stamilio DM, DeFranco E, Paré E, et al. Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110(5):1075-82. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000286759.49895.46.
doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000286759.49895.46
pmid: 17978122
|
7. |
Wang LL, Chen JY, Yang HX, et al. Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2019; 54(6):375-80. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.06.004.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.06.004
|
8. |
Fiocchi F, Petrella E, Nocetti L, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of uterine scar after previous caesarean section: comparison with 3T-magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. Radiol Med 2015; 120(2):228-38. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0431-y.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0431-y
|
9. |
Swift BE, Shah PS, Farine D. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness after prior cesarean section to predict uterine rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98(7):830-41. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13585.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.13585
|
10. |
Glavind J, Madsen LD, Uldbjerg N, et al. Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 201:65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.019
pmid: 27064944
|
11. |
Uharček P, Brešťanský A, Ravinger J, et al. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292(3):609-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3687-0.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3687-0
|
12. |
Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, et al. Deficient lower-segment cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31(1):72-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.5200.
doi: 10.1002/uog.5200
|
13. |
Yao M, Wang W, Zhou J, et al. Cesarean section scar diverticulum evaluation by saline contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: the relationship between variable parameters and longer menstrual bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2017; 43(4):696-704. doi: 10.1111/jog.13255.
doi: 10.1111/jog.13255
|
14. |
Tang X, Wang J, Du Y, et al. Caesarean scar defect: risk factors and comparison of evaluation efficacy between transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 242:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.001.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.001
|
15. |
Lim KK, Noe G, Hornsey E, et al. Clinical applications of 3D T2-weighted MRI in pelvic imaging. Abdom Imaging 2014; 39(5):1052-62. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0124-y.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0124-y
|
16. |
Polanec SH, Lazar M, Wengert GJ, et al. 3D T2-weighted imaging to shorten multiparametric prostate MRI protocols. Eur Radiol 2018; 28(4):1634-41. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5120-5.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5120-5
|
17. |
Lv P, Dai Y, Lin J, et al. A comparison study between 3D T2-weighted SPACE and conventional 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo in assessment of carotid plaque. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 33(3):395-400. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-1017-7.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-1017-7
|
18. |
Ucar M, Tokgoz N, Koc AM, et al. Assessment of 3D T2-weighted high-sampling-efficiency technique (SPACE) for detection of cerebellar tonsillar motion: new useful sign for Chiari I malformation. Clin Imaging 2015; 39(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.08.011.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.08.011
|
19. |
Li P, Liu P, Chen C, et al. The 3D reconstructions of female pelvic autonomic nerves and their related organs based on MRI: a first step towards neuronavigation during nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Eur Radiol 2018; 28(11):4561-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5453-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5453-8
|
20. |
Tsuboyama T, Takei O, Okada A, et al. Effect of uterine position and intrapelvic motions on the image quality of 3D T2-weighted MRI of the uterus: can short prescans predict the non-diagnostic image quality? Eur J Radiol 2020; 130: 109186. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109186.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109186
|
21. |
Whittington JR, Slaton KB, Rhomberg ME, et al. Uterine dehiscence and subsequent pregnancy management: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2021; 76(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000856.
doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000856
pmid: 33506878
|
22. |
Asakura H, Nakai A, Ishikawa G, et al. Prediction of uterine dehiscence by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labor: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography. J Nippon Med Sch 2000; 67(5):352-6. doi: 10.1272/jnms.67.352.
doi: 10.1272/jnms.67.352
pmid: 11031364
|
23. |
Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2006; 295(15):1809-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809.
doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809
pmid: 16622143
|
24. |
Chen I, Jhangri GS, Lacasse M, et al. Relationship between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes in Northern Alberta. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2015; 37(7):598-605. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30197-3.
doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30197-3
|
25. |
Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, et al. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34(1):85-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6405.
doi: 10.1002/uog.6405
pmid: 19565535
|